Explain how and why Matthew may have edited Mark's Gospel

By Editorial Team Feb 21, 2022

Explain how and why Matthew may have edited Mark's Gospel

Explain how and why Matthew may have edited Mark's Gospel. Use the following two sets of passages to support your claim.

According to course materials (Bible, textbook, digital materials linked below, etc.):

  1. How and why would Matthew have edited Mark 6:45-52 contrasted with Matthew 14:25-27,32-33?
  2. How and why would Matthew have edited Mark 9:2-10 contrasted with Matthew 17:1-13?

Be sure to distinguish between paraphrase and direct quotes. Type a 350-750 word paper using MLA formatting.



                                                                       Sample Response

                                              Why Matthew May Have Edited Mark's Gospel

  1. How and why would Matthew have edited Mark 6:45-52 contrasted with Matthew 14:25-27,32-33?

The book of Mathew has been widely regarded to have utilized the book of Mark's version that has acted as a reference to the book of Mathew and thus changing scriptures to fit the need of the author, who is Mathew. Mathew 14:25-27 and verses 32 to 33 differ from the chapter pointed out in Mark 6:45 to 52. These chapters are all about the story of Jesus walking on water after h had fed the five thousand people who had come to listen to the sermon (Roh, 434). According to the illustration presented in Mathew, there is a clear indication of how Mathew has portrayed the act of being a great storyteller. On analysis, booth Mark and Mathew are offering an elaboration of the miracle of Jesus walking on water. Concerning this story, Mathew has provided an interpretation where h enables the reader to, and the people involved in the miracle are amazed, reinforcing their faith in God.

Moreover, this event contributed to the situation where they fit within the narrative, and developing faith in the son of God depicted how God's work is excellent. Therefore, concerning this story, Mark tells the story in a situation encountered, but it does not get into how Jesus had performed the miracles. Furthermore, this has depicted a contradicting situation by the four evangelists in the bible who have a similarity of talking about God (Roh, 435). As a Jewish in most of the gospels, Mathew seeks to tell the story of Jesus Christ to the Jewish audience characterized as distinctive. The core purpose of Mathew is writing the gospel to convince people that Jesus is the promised Messiah of God and portray a clear picture like us human beings.

On the other hand, Mark and his gospel have been written in a manner that seems to act like a motivational call for people to go into action and conversation. Equally, this has been depicted from the attempts of Mark to associate Jesus to a lion that is Jesus himself. The lion is considered Jesus Christ, who has also been recognized to be the way Jesus is the king of all like the lion is the king of the jungle.

  1. How and why would Matthew have edited Mark 9:2-10 contrasted with Matthew 17:1-13?

The two verses have both indicated the transfiguration of Jesus Christ. In Mathew, there is a clear illustration of the story where it elaborates on the ascending of Jesus, while in Mark's depiction, it indicates a situation where the disciples were questioning Jesus about Elijah and thus asking why he must come first (Svartvik, 28). However, Jesus answers them that he has already come, and they should not speak concerning what happened until the son of man has risen from the dead. All these illustrations that have been depicted provide mysticism to Jesus that the son of God shall contain. Equally, Mathew tells the same story that he represents God's power, thus reinforcing the disciples' act to take stock in Jesus Christ.

Mathew and Mark's gospels have developed an apparent similarity, and they have both been connected for a good reason. It has been effectively understood that most people have identified that Mathew adopted Mark's gospel fully for his uses. These passages from Mark 9:2 to 10 and 17:1 to 13 cannot be exceptional. They are identified to illustrate the miracle of Jesus Christ walking on water. Based on Mathew, he has indicated that the disciples were frightened and they took Jesus for a ghost., "It is a ghost," they cried out (Svartvik, 32). Mathew has portrayed tremendous skills and his ability to describe the events surrounding the entire life of Jesus than how Mark has described all activities associated with the life of Jesus Christ. Mathew, therefore, edited Mark's gospel to fit the narrative and ensure that he has effectively grasped the attention of the people who will be reading the gospel and blister their faith in God. When Jesus was walking on water, he left his disciples amazed and thus telling Peter to walk on water to where he was. As perter began walking on water, he was distracted by the surroundings, and as he faltered, he began to sink, and this is the point where his faith was shaken. Thus Jesus asked him, "why to have such little faith and doubt me?" (Svartvik, 38). All of these activities have been told to depict Jesus having true power and creating a sense in human beings that we need Jesus Christ in our lives. Therefore, Mathew does an excellent job in messaging the gospel that has been depicted in Mark.

Additionally, the passages from Mark 9:2 to 10 and Mathew 17:1 to 13 portray teaching about Jesus' transfiguration. Therefore, it is realistic that Mathew has borrowed from the gospel of Mark. The depiction of Mark in the events shows the details associated with Jesus taking Peter, John, and James to the high mountain. His emphasis was on clothes that became dazzling white, and nothing could be bleached white than them during this process. There is a slight difference in the analysis of the two gospel books, but the two books have more remarkable similarities concerning events.


                                                                   Works Cited

Roh, James A. "The Gospel as Stories: A Narrative Approach to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John." (2021): 433-435.

Svartvik, Jesper. "Matthew and Mark." Matthew and His Christian Contempories. Continuum, 2008. 27-49.






Need help with this or similar assignment?

  • Tell Us Your Requirements: Please provide us with the specifics of your paper so that we may do our best to personalize it. Select the discipline, word count, format, academic level, and other details on the order form.
  • Connect with the Best Writer: Consult and collaborate with an expert and complete your paper on schedule.
  • Monitor the progress: Control the work process by checking the completed parts of your document right away. You can easily submit your comments by chatting with your essay writer on our website.
  • Download Your Paper: Get your paper written according to your specifications. It is important to note that you only pay for an essay when you are completely satisfied with the outcome. Please provide us your feedback about our collaboration.



Click on the prompt below to place an order 



About Us

Eprowriters.net is an afilliate blog of Eprowriters.com, a custom essay writing service that has been providing academic support with great success for more than five years. We are constantly updating our objectives in order to improve the quality of service we deliver and increase client satisfaction. We’ve progressed to an original concept as a result of our success.