NU530 Unit 6 Assignment Accreditation Plan

By Editorial Team Jun 21, 2022

NU530 Unit 6 Assignment Accreditation Plan

Instructions

One way an organization communicates with its constituents is by its accreditation. Your department head knows that you are in a graduate program and has asked you to assist the department head that works with accreditation and licensure in your facility. She has asked you to develop an initial plan to gain accreditation for a new facility that your organization is opening. Choose one accreditation that is appropriate for the facility. Write an introductory paragraph then follow it with the initial plan in table format and should include:

  • One type of accreditation needed for the facility and in 1-2 sentences, why it is needed for the facility
  • Estimate the amount of time it will take for the new facility to attain accreditation
  • What resources are needed
  • Estimate direct costs for accreditation
  • Estimate the financial impact on revenue if not earning accreditation

For example:

Type of Accreditation

Time Needed

Resources Required

Direct Costs for Accreditation

Financial impact if Accreditation not Earned

 

       

Provide a paragraph under the table with conclusions and any potential limitation of this accreditation.

Please provide 3-4 references from scholarly journals and websites provided in the course.

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

Submit your assignment by Sunday at midnight.

Rubric

NU530 Unit 6 Assignment Accreditation Plan

NU530 Unit 6 Assignment Accreditation Plan

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

NU530-CO5

10 pts

Level 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.

9 pts

Level 4

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.

8 pts

Level 3

Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.

7 pts

Level 2

Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.

6 pts

Level 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.

0 pts

Level 0

Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

NU530-CO5; PRICE-C; PRICE-R

20 pts

Level 5

Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

18 pts

Level 4

Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

16 pts

Level 3

Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

14 pts

Level 2

Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.

12 pts

Level 1

Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

0 pts

Level 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process

NU530-CO5; PRICE-P

20 pts

Level 5

All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

18 pts

Level 4

Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

16 pts

Level 3

Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.

14 pts

Level 2

Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.

12 pts

Level 1

Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.

0 pts

Level 0

The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

NU530-CO1; NU530-CO5; PRICE-I

35 pts

Level 5

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

32 pts

Level 4

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

28 pts

Level 3

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

25 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

21 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

NU530-CO1; NU530-CO5; PRICE-I

10 pts

Level 5

States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.

9 pts

Level 4

States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.

8 pts

Level 3

States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.

7 pts

Level 2

States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

6 pts

Level 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.

0 pts

Level 0

States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

PRICE-I

10 pts

Level 5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

9 pts

Level 4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

8 pts

Level 3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

7 pts

Level 2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6 pts

Level 1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0 pts

Level 0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

PRICE-I

10 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a strong command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

8 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

PRICE-P; PRICE-I

10 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

9 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

8 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

7 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

6 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

10 pts

 

 


Need help with this or similar assignment?


  • Tell Us Your Requirements
  • Connect with the Best Writer
  • Monitor the progress
  • Download Your Paper.

 

Click on the prompt below to place an order

 


About Us


Eprowriters.net is an afilliate blog of Eprowriters.com, a custom essay writing service that has been providing academic support with great success for more than five years. We are constantly updating our objectives in order to improve the quality of service we deliver and increase client satisfaction. We’ve progressed to an original concept as a result of our success.